How Leaders Like to Be Seen at the Olympic Games!

Olympic games have been glamorous events ever since they began in 776 BC. After the Roman Emperor Theodosius banned the games as “pagan religious festival” in 393 AD, the summer Olympic games began anew in modern times 1894, Athens. Rulers of host countries try their best to capitalise on the games and try their best to be seen in a desirable manner.

Sometimes fate intervenes and it can be a national disaster like host Russia loosing to Finland in Ice-Hockey in 2014 Sochi.

Photo source:

or “Aryan” German athletes losing to a Black American Jesse Owens in Munich 1936.

 Photo source:

Sometimes there may be other reasons for the ruler to be unhappy; e.g. being tired, ill or feeling that she has better things to do:

 Photo source:

Rulers can be rather lonely at the Olympics. With no one to share emotions with, this can be very stressful. Cambodia's King Norodom Sihamoni attends the opening ceremony of the Beijing 2008 Olympic Games at the National Stadium, August 8, 2008.

Photo source:

It wasn’t always like this. A very long time ago “Rulers” were treated a bit more mercifully.

Photo shows (left to right) Prince Wilhelm of Sweden and Norway (1884-1965), Duke of Södermanland; Crown Prince Gustav VI Adolf of Sweden (1882-1973) with their father King Gustav V at the 1912 Summer Olympic Games in Stockholm, Sweden – all being very aristocratic and restrained. Photo source: 

In those days, royals and other demigods were usually portrayed in full regalia and looking their best only as they dutifully served the nation as George VI at the London Olympics in 1948.

Photo source: 

The Japanese Emperor Shōwa with the Empress Kojun at the Olympics Games in Tokyo 1964 behaving with the imperial manner and dignified grace expected of them.

Photo source:

Sometimes tragedy strikes at the Olympic Games. West German Chancellor Willy Brandt in the Munich Olympics of 1976, looking very distressed after the Palestinian terrorist group Black September had killed 11 Israeli athletes and one West German Police officer.

 Photo source:

Leaders like Soviet Union’s Brezhnev in the Moscow summer Olympics of 1980 continued this sombre grimness in their public appearances.

Photo source:

Now, there was another side to Brezhnev, which helped 265 million people endure the Soviet system in all its grimness. Here is a couple of those delightful jokes:

At the 1980 Olympics, Brezhnev begins his speech."O!" — applause. "O!" — more applause. "O!" — yet more applause. "O!" — an ovation. "O!!!" — the whole audience stands up and applauds.An aide comes running to the podium and whispers, "Leonid Ilyich, that's the Olympic rings, you don't need to read it!"

Brezhnev and Napoleon meet in the next world.`Oh-h-h, if only we'd had such a brilliant commander as yourself in the Soviet Union instead of Stalin,' Brezhnev says to Napoleon, `then we wouldn't have allowed Hitler to cross our threshold.'`And if I had newspapers like your Pravda,' says Napoleon, `not a soul would have heard about Waterloo.' Source:

 This “official” style of portraying the “rulers” at their most dignified continues in China today.

Chinese President Hu Jintao in Beijing 2008, happily witnessing the great glory of his people.

Photo source:

Chinese President Xi Jinping at the opening ceremony of the 22nd Winter Olympic Games in Sochi, Russia, Feb. 7, 2014. In both photos everyone is smiling and clapping happily while expressing well-rehearsed behaviour.

Photo source: 

But nowadays many leaders have to utilise the photo ops best by themselves and take “selfies”:

Photo source: 

Being seen with the right people is very important. It’s actually one of the things which get people to the top in the first place.

Photo source: 

Fortunately, nowadays Heads-of-States can be seen having fun or enjoying sports like anyone else.

King Carl Gustav XII and Queen Silvia attend the women's Olympic curling gold medal game between Canada and Sweden at the Vancouver Olympic Centre on Day 15 of the 2010 Winter Olympic Games in Vancouver February 26, 2010. Photo source: 

Sometimes they might have a tiff about the results or the other one's public behaviour:

Photo source: 

Sometimes things really begin to go wrong and one just needs to yell.

Photo source: 

President George W Bush is an all time favourite when it comes to humour (at his expense). So here’s the Brezhnev of USA at it.

Photo source: 

 Photo source: 

But it seems that even he can be bored, in suitable company.

Photo source: 

In place of 265 million citizens of his own country, as in the case of Brezhnev, it’s American talk-show hosts who are trying to be funny about Russia’s President Vladimir Putin. Here are some examples:

• "Today, the Olympic torch arrived in Sochi. But Vladimir Putin immediately put it out because he thought it was too flaming." –Conan O'Brien
• "Organizers for the Sochi Olympics have had trouble filling seats for the biathlon. This is because Vladimir Putin is warning people away from any event containing 'bi.'" –Conan O'Brien 
• "On Friday, Russian President Vladimir Putin said gay people at the Olympics should not fear for their safety despite the country's anti-gay laws. He said they should fear for their safety because they're in Russia." –Jimmy Fallon 

But, Russians are still the best when it comes to humour about their own ruler. This Russian one going around in Russia is wonderful:

Putin’s stare penetrates a ten-foot lead wall and brings a kettle to a boil within 10 seconds from three miles away. For public safety he must wear special contact lenses at all times.  Source:

Why We Elect Bad and Incompetent Rulers?

People hire others to take care of tasks they themselves can’t do or don’t want to do. 

Selecting a suitable person for any job is a very complex task with very stringent criteria for selecting and requires trained and experienced staff. Not only should the selectors be aware of all the factors that affect the process of securing a “job-person match”, but they should also select the candidate without breaking any antidiscrimination laws and guidelines in force. Considering all this, what kind of criteria are utilised to recruit people?

Photo source:

Flippant Criteria to elect People to Rule Us

We use such stringent criteria to recruit people who work for us but use flippant criteria to elect our rulers. When asked about their choice of candidate in elections, many people give the following reasons:

• He looks so handsome
• She is a celebrity who believes in equal opportunities
• He believes that the government should do more for equality
• The party believes that global warming is a major threat to our way of life etc.

Photo source:

“A key characteristic of democracy is the responsiveness of the government to the preferences of its citizens” Robert Dahl (1971) guided us how to measure the effectiveness of voter choices. Yet, in all political systems, ranging from constitutional monarchy to representative democracy, we use such flippant criteria for “selecting” our rulers. Why?

Photo source:

We know that the North Koreans don’t have much choice in electing their rulers. Citizens also do not get to elect constitutional monarchs, as they are chosen from among the earlier monarch’s eligible offspring. But how about incumbent rulers like George Bush, being re-elected after one of the most dismal track records in US history? All over the world, we have lots and lots of our rulers who are utterly incompetent, and according to Paul Krugman’s NewYork Times blog, excel in not seeing their incompetence. 

But what does it say about the people who vote the incompetent ones to power?

Stringent Criteria for Recruiting People to Work

In every workplace, selection criteria are usually developed from four main areas:

1. Qualifications
2. Attributes
3. Knowledge
4. Skills and abilities 

Photo source:

These all are clearly outlined in the job analysis and explicitly defined in the job description. Further, there is the concept of demonstrated ability. This usually means placing a huge weighting on experience and previous job performance. Interviewers like to hear what the candidate has achieved elsewhere, so they can imagine what the candidate would likely do for the job s/he is being recruited into.

Qualification: This usually means a formal recognition that the candidate has, under formal supervision and guidance, acquired expertise in the field. Here are some typical examples of qualification requirements:

• Preferred 4 years prior Information Technology experience required. Minimum: Bachelor’s degree in Computer Science or a related field
• A research doctorate or equivalent in hydrology
• A Certificate level qualification with a minimum of 3 years worth practical experience of working in a child care centre

Photo source:

Attributes: Attributes are behaviours, which are required in the desired job e.g., flexibility, attention to detail, service orientation, independence and initiative etc. In a job interview, the candidate might be asked to give examples of “a situation in your previous job where you demonstrated independence and initiative”.

Knowledge: How much the candidate knows about the field, the subject matter necessary to do the job well and it is usually measured by:

• A thorough understanding of e.g. current issues in teaching planning in higher education, including national policy settings
• Specific knowledge of e.g. flux cored arc welding
• Demonstrated knowledge coupled with practical skills for e.g. handling immigrant parents and guardians of teenaged school children in public schools

Photo source:

Skills: Skills can range from so called transferrable skills like Negotiation skills, Project Management Skills or Leadership Skills to highly job-specific skills like “Certification for Cloud Computing Infrastructure management” or “Certification for flux cored arc welding, oxy-acetylene welding, metal inert gas (MIG) welding, tungsten inert gas (TIG) welding and manual metal arc (MMA) welding”.

Photo source:

Criteria Used to Elect Rulers Totally Useless in Job Requirements

If we were to apply the criteria we use to recruit people who work for us to “select” people who currently rule us, almost 90% of our rulers should be kicked out as utterly incompetent!

In a constitutional monarchy, being born in that particular family is about the only criteria for being chosen as the monarch. Even being mad is good enough for the job e.g., Caligula of Rome, Fyodor I and Ivan V and VI of Russia, Charles II of Spain, Alfonso VI of Portugal, Charles VI of France, Ludwig II of Bavaria, Henry VI and George III of UK. When the heir presumptive to the Austro-Hungarian throne, Archduke Ferdinand and his wife, Countess Sophie Chotek, were assassinated in Sarajevo, the Emperor Franz Jospeh “breathed a sigh of relief” that the unsuitable Sophie was removed (King and Woolmans, 2013).

Photo source: 

In modern Western democracies, most of our “rulers” are professional politicians who believe they have the required expertise, skills, aptitudes and attributes but rarely give any proof that they have achieved anything similar in their earlier endeavours. 

Why do voters put up with this kind of belief with no evidence of achievement?

The spatial theory of voting (Downs, 1957) claims that voters have a most preferred policy or “bliss point” and measures alternative candidates/policies by judging how “close” they are to that ideal. However, research has shown that this ideological “position” may not be always so clear (Degan and Merlo, 2009).

Photo source: 

In high-profile single candidate elections e.g. US Presidential elections, personal characteristics of the candidate are very important along with party label (Marsh, 2005).

Criteria Guidelines for Choosing Rulers

The criteria to judge a politician candidate, there are lots of them: Lets’ take two examples. 

The first one is the comprehensive guideline from the League of Women Voters: 

1. Decide what you are looking for in a candidate.
2. Find out about the candidates
3. Gather materials about the candidates
4. Evaluate candidates' stands on issues
5. Learn about the candidates' leadership abilities
6. Learn how other people view the candidate
7. Sorting it all out

These are very good guidelines. But, how many voters actually go to all that trouble? Further, significantly missing from this list is the proof of previous achievement, which answers the question “How do we know that you can really do what you say you will do?”

Photo source: 

The second example of a set of criteria is from the 2016 US Presidential Candidate Selector: 

The 18 questions lets the voter find how her/his own position aligns to the candidate’s answer on issues such as Gun Control, Minimum Wage, Immigration Law, Marijuana Laws, Abortion etc. But, here also there is no way to check how the candidate will demonstrate the mix of qualifications, attributes, skills and competence demonstrated in past performance. If the candidate says that she believes that marijuana should be legalised, there is no explanation of how is she going to get it done.

Photo source:

Rather often in parliamentary elections, voters may choose candidates as long as they are within the party of the voter’s choice (Mair, 1987:92) e.g., Conservative and Unionist Party or Labour Party in UK. But few people actually ask the candidates to demonstrate capability for promised actions on the basis of past performance as recruiters do in job interviews. 

The Rolling Stone magazine had an interesting article “The Ten Worst Members of the Worst Congress Ever”, where significantly almost each example personally benefitted much more from being in the US Congress than in their business attempts before that.

Photo source: 

Studies have shown that “Narcissistic People are Most Likely to Emerge as Leaders”. Narcissism makes people utterly self-centred, who lack any empathy for others and habitually exaggerate their talents and abilities”. People around them also tend to see them as leaders who can “really lead them”.

Photo source: 

If we are honest, we would notice that in most countries things are good not because of the leaders but inspite of them. Isn’t it time to start upgrading political leader selection methods all over the world?

Democracy 2,0, where are you?

Sources:

• Degan, Arianna, Merlo Antonio. (2009). Do Voters vote ideologically? Science Direct. Journal of Economic Theory 144 (2009) 1868-1894.
• Dahl, Robert A. 1971. Polyarchy: Participation and Opposition. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
• Downs, A. (1957). An Economic Theory of Democracy, Harper and Row, New York, NY,
• King, Greg., and Woolmans, Sue, 2013. ‘The Assassination of the Archduke: Sarajevo 1914 and the Romance That Changed the World’.
• Mair, Peter and Michael Marsh (2004) ‘Political Parties in Electoral Markets in Postwar Ireland’, in Peter Mair, Wolfgang Muller and Fritz Plasser, eds. Political Parties and Electoral Change: Party Responses to Electoral Markets, pp. 234-63. London: Sage.
• Marsh, Michael (2005). Candidates or parties? Objects of electoral choice in Ireland. Department of Political Science Trinity College, Dublin, Republic of Ireland. http://www.tcd.ie/Political_Science/Staff/Michael.Marsh