Wednesday, 22 May 2013

What is the Opposite of Love - Hatred or Indifference?


Love has a myriad faces, belongs to no one yet touches everyone. We experience love as the rush of wondrous emotions that makes us see all through pink eyeglasses. 

It is the joy of creation when a new life is born. It is the pride of achievement in another's success. Love also becomes life-shattering pain when we love but are not loved in return. 

If love can have so many faces, does love have an opposite?

What is the opposite of love? Is it?

  • Hatred
  • Anger
  • Derision
  • Fear
  • Indifference 

Most people when asked; “What is the opposite of love?” will answer hate. The traditional argument given is that love is a positive emotion, while hatred is a negative emotion. They are, however, seen as two sides of the coin. Both evoke strong feelings. Hatred is often love gone wrong. Rather too often people disappointed in love (often due to wrong or excessive expectations) or being unable to deal with unrequited love end up in hatred

I hate marmite. Marmite has never done anything bad to me, but I have never liked it and it is not unrequited love. I also hate Amaretto di Saronno liquor, because I have ghastly memories attached to it, which have nothing to do with the taste of the liquor itself.


Anger is more problematic as an opposite. We can be angry with a person we love, but still love. Parents can often be very angry with their children for something they have done or failed to do yet the love is as strong as before so anger can’t be the opposite of love.

Derision, where one derides or ridicules, mocks another person, is common. But is derision, really an opposite of love? Can they co-exist? Yes, human relationships are extremely complicated. Sometimes we can observe people who love each other, rather offhandedly ridiculing the other. Other people can be speechless at the insults or jibes some people who have been married long hurl at each other. What used to be wild and passionate earth-shattering sex 30 years ago becomes a constant bickering and razor sharp jibes. An aunt of mine used to lacerate her husband, often in front of others, but if someone else said one word against him, she would defend him valiantly by saying, “Who gave you the right to criticize him, only I can do that!”


Fear – Fear is a universal emotion. Can we fear and love at the same time? Yes. Sometimes we see people saying something like “Don’t tell him how expensive the curtains were” or “Don’t tell her that we ordered take-away and beer!” though there seems to be no shortage of love. People often love their despotic rulers though they fear them. So, fear and love are not opposites, well not in an ordinary sense.
But if we go beyond the ordinary way of reckoning things and understanding reality fears and tears define reality for most of us. Fear is an emotion that separates us from each other. Fear is the cloud of unknowing that separates the human spirit from finding its way home. Love, on the other hand is the beacon in the night that leads us to where we belong. 


IndifferenceIndifference can be seen as an absence of emotions. It is coldness as a manifestation of negativity. The term whatever, commonly used by many young people, is often cited as a symbol of indifference. 

The opposite of love is not hate, it's indifference. The opposite of beauty is not ugliness, it's indifference. The opposite of faith is not heresy, it's indifference. And the opposite of life is not death, but indifference between life and death.” Elie Wiesel (Jewish-American political activist and Nobel Prize winner) US News & World Report (27 October 1986). Here, the main argument is that, as intense emotions, love and hate are two sides of the same coin while indifference is a deficiency.


Photo source:

Is There A Typical Hate Personality Type?

We know what lovers are like from literature and poetry, e.g. Rome and Juliet from Shakespeare. 


Photo source:

But what kind of a person is a typical hater?

It’s hard to be aggressive without strong feelings of hatred. High neuroticism in men (Barnes et al., 1991), while high neuroticism and high extraversion in women (Buss, 1991) may cause them to use psychological aggression in relationships.


Photo source:

Is there a bell curve of hate? Linking hate to emotional development or rather its problems, in the context of genocide and similar violence, Steven Baum (2007) found that 15-20% were ‘perpetrators’, 60-70% were ‘bystanders’ or ordinary people, while 15-20% ‘altruistic rescuers’ or ‘helpers’.



But how could we predict what ‘kind’ of people belong to which group?

All attempts at producing markers from physical characteristics, education, gender, sexual preference, social status or previous life history tend to fall short as reliable predictors. Clinical tests of psychological evaluation are also not reliable always. 

It wasn’t that long ago when emotional maturation in psychology was seen to have been achieved through vaginal orgasm in a heterosexual intercourse alone, and nothing else was ‘mature’ enough.

Chemical Changes in People Who Fall in Love


Love and being in love are different. But if we contrast people of both sexes being in love with the ‘opposite’, i.e., not being in love, we can detect behavioural changes as well as hormonal ones too. Levels of some hormones change radically when we fall in love and these changes last, on average, from 18 months to 3 years.

Cortisol levels of people in love are significantly higher meaning they are under huge stress. Testosterone levels are lower in men in love and higher in women. All difference in hormone levels disappear in 12-24 months (Marazziti et al, 2004).


Hungry For Love - Can’t Tolerate The Absence of Being In Love

People in many cultures have tried to control how individuals are attracted to each others. Fearing social decay, racial impurity, cultural degeneration, unsuitability of the other person or whatever reasons they come up with; they have tried to keep lovers separate. Sometimes the love or attraction surmounts all such attempts but sometimes it destroys them.

The majority of world cultures view marital and conjugal infidelity negatively and actively discourage it through a mixture of shame, guilt and punishment, which may range from mild disapproval to death by stoning e.g., in Saudi Arabia and Somalia.


Infidelity, however, is rampant. Durex, the condom makers, claim that 22% of global respondents have had extra-marital sex. A whopping 70% of Norwegians in this study admit to having had one-night stands.

60% to 75% of American college students report extradyadic (i.e., with a person outside the romantic relationship dyad) involvement in USA, though infidelity causes self-doubt, anger and depression in the ‘betrayed’ partner (Barta & Klein, 2005).


Is conjugal infidelity a cause or result of martial dissolution? Research (17-year longitudinal study of 1475 people by Previti & Amato, 2004) claims that sexual fidelity is central in maintaining marital satisfaction and stability.

If hormonal level changes due to falling in love balance out in 12-24 months, does it mean that the risk of infidelity will rise logarithmically? Situational factors fostering infidelity are extremely complicated to understand but it has been shown that self-regulation or self-control is a prime factor. Lack of or depleted self-regulation may increase the likelihood of infidelity (Ciarocco et al., 2012).


Whether we talk of love, hatred or indifference as qualities and personality traits, it is good to remember that we do not love personality traits, but persons. These traits just make them more or less loveable.



Photo source:


References:
  • Barnes GE, Greenwood L, Sommer R. 1991. Courtship violence within a Canadian sample of male college students. Family Relations 40:34–48.
  • Baum, Steven K. (2004): A bell curve of hate?, Journal of Genocide Research, 6:4, 567-577
  • Buss DM. 1991. Conflict in married couples: Personality predictors of anger and upset. Journal of Personality 59:663–688.
  • Marazzitti, Donatella; Canale, Domenico. Hormonal changes when falling in love. Psychoneuroendocrinology (2004) 29, 931-936.
  • Previti, Denise; Amato Paul R. Is Infidelity a Cause or a Consequence of Poor Marital Quality? Journal of Social and Personal Relationships 2004 21: 217


Sunday, 17 February 2013

Why Should Long Dead Kings like Richard III be Rehabilitated?


History if always written by the victors and those who are defeated (usually in battles) are vilified and depicted for posterity as embodiments of all the qualities, which should be loathed. 

This seems to be a general rule ranging from Egyptian Pharaohs of the old kingdom (3rd millennium BC) to the Republican and Democrat presidents who take turns occupying the White House in Washington, USA even in our iHistory age.


Occasionally, by a twist of fortune, some hapless ruler, much maligned by the derisive and venomous propaganda of their successors are indeed rehabilitated. 

The latest one with such luck is Richard III, the last English king of the House of York (1483-1485). Shakespeare portrayed Richard III as an ugly hunchback, “rudely stamp’d”, “deformed, unfinish’d” and who cannot “strut before a wanton ambling nymph”. It is so easy to imagine Richard III, like Gollum in the Lord of the Rings contorted in self-loathing and hissing out "I am determined to prove a villain / And hate the idle pleasures of these days." It is also Shakespeare’s genius, which has made Richard III utter some memorable quotes like:
  •  Now is the winter of our discontent" (a phrase later used to refer to James Callahan’s 1978-1979 prime ministership in England)
  • "A horse, a horse, my kingdom for a horse!"

The Crimes of King Richard III

  • Coming to power by employing questionable means (having Edward IV’s marriage declared invalid as he was still legally married thus making Edward V illegitimate and thus not eligible to become a king)
  • Getting rid of two young princes by having them murdered
  • Beheading people like the Duke of Buckingham who rebelled against him

All these were pretty standard stuff in those days, anywhere in the world except rather often among some tribes for whom we contemptuously use names like aboriginals or primitives.

Coming to power by questionable means – Well, that’s pretty common in ‘civilized’ democracies also today. Countless voters then lying in their graves secured the election of John F. Kennedy in 1960, George Bush Jr. also came to power using ‘questionable means’ not to talk of Silvio Berlusconi.

Getting rid of people who challenge our ideologies and ‘way of life’ – nowadays we use names like war on terror, ethnic conflict, regime change or finding weapons of mass destruction to justify similar actions.


Politicians turning things upside down to serve regime interests as in the case of Anna Politkovskaya is also pretty common nowadays.

Achievements of King Richard III

They are rather impressive, especially considering his short reign of 2 years 1483-1485. In fact, some of his ideas were centuries ahead of their times.

  • Council of the North did begin to improve conditions for Northern England as before that most economic activity centred on the capital alone. 
  • Court of requests, an institution that enabled poor people who could not afford the expensive lawyers in the formal courts could have their cases heard officially (Kleineke, 2007)
  • Judicial bail system, to secure the rights of the accused and protect them from imprisonment before trial and not have their property seized. 
  • Rescinded the ban of printing and selling books.
  • Ordered the translation of the written laws into English from traditional French

Compare fairly and without bias the achievements of Richard III to 10 years of Tony Blair’s (1997-2007) or 8 years of George Bush Jr.’s (2001-2009) ‘reign’ and their ‘body count’ and both of them may have to hang their heads in shame sitting in jail. You may like to place your bets on the likelihood, but that is most unlikely to happen even in 2014!


Rehabilitation of Rulers Maligned by Subsequent History

The recent rehabilitation of the last Plantagenet king of England, Richard III after his remains were discovered under a car park in Leicester, UK may start a boom of making maligned ‘villains’ appear transformed as heroes from under the veils of infamy. Now there is a campaign in Scotland to rehabilitate the blood-tarnished image of the 11th century king Macbeth.


Cleopatra VII, who ruled Egypt for 21 years, lost her kingdom, regained it, lost it again and was good at ruling an empire has been painted as a wanton and lusty temptress. That she probably was, but she was infinitely more. Speaking nine languages, having great political acumen and charm, she seems to have been totally devoted to her country. This would be a not so common trait among contemporary politicians. Is it time to rehabilitate Cleopatra?


Stalin, the big daddy of baddies, with a killing toll of about 20 million (Robert Conquest: The Great Terror, 2007) is fast being rehabilitated in certain quarters. Though other may not like it, neo-Stalinism is here to stay. Neo-Stalinism is, according to Frederick Copleston, S. J., 
"..not exclusively an expression of a desire to control, dominate, repress and dragoon; it is also the expression of a desire that Russia, while making use of western science and technology, should avoid contamination by western 'degenerate' attitudes and pursue her own path."

Mao Zedong, the burly moonfaced demigod of China has been re-elevated to his demi-god status in modern China. Anyone who even went near him and can dictate, write or afford ghostwriters has written eulogies like his last concubine (Zhang Yufeng) and his bodyguard (Li Yinqiao) did.


Pol Pot, a heavyweight baddie, who killed 1-3 million people (out of a population of 8.4 million), is fairly advanced on the way to rehabilitation. Wasn’t it so that the British and Americans voted in the UN to legitimise the defeated regime of Pol Pot (Pilger, 2005)?


When is the biggest of the baddies, a certain Austrian postcard painter, who killed 30-50 million people, although using other methods than badly painted postcards, going to be rehabilitated? Or is he going to perpetually anchored in a repository of history's worst baddies along with Nero, Chengiz Khan etc.


Small disclaimer here: This last item was just out of academic interest. I am not even remotely interested in Austrian postcard painters and their politics.


Adolf Hitler is actually getting rather popular in India, for very different reasons though. The brand just arouses people and they buy. Anti-semitism or the hate messages of his don't have any place there, but he is seen as a cool and tough guy who can make trains run on time, a kind of Marlboro man among leaders. Of course the fact that he opposed and fought Britain, and this hastened Indian independence is also an argument though very few Indians nowadays even think of this aspect.

Photo source:

Should History be Rewritten?

The commercial angle and the attraction of theme parks á la Osama Bin Laden in Abbotabad as has been suggested by DavidMitchell of the Observer is one approach, good for the local economy.

Seriously speaking, yes, history should be continuously re-examined and re-evaluated in the light of new findings. Consider, for example the debunking of the Aryan Invasion Theory (Metspalu, 2011). 

This debunking of the Aryan invasion theory allows us:
  • To see matters in an entirely different perspective without the burdens of racial and ethnic propaganda
  • We can appreciate the achievements of other peoples and nations
  • The agendas of hate or maligning others may give way to genuine appreciation and universal brotherhood.


Sources:
  • Tell Me No Lies: Investigative Journalism and its Triumphs, Edited by John Pilger. Vintage Paperback, 2005, £8.99
  • Hannes Kleineke, ‘Richard III and the Origins of the Court of Requests’. The Ricardian, Vol. XVII, 2007, pp. 22–32
  • Metspalu, Mait. Shared and unique components of human population structure and genome-wide signals of positive selection in South Asia. American journal of human genetics. 09.12.2011. Volume: 89 Issue: 6 Page: 731